Swinburne, Peter van Inwagen, and Stephen John Wykstra. Rowe, Bruce Russell, Eleonore Stump, Richard G.
Gale, Daniel Howard-Snyder, Alvin Plantinga, William L. The second asserts that pleasure and pain, given their biological role, are better explained by hypotheses other than theism.
The first affirms that there is no reason for God to permit either certain specific horrors or the variety and profusion of undeserved suffering. The volume focuses on two versions of the argument. The Evidential Argument from Evil presents five classic statements on this issue by eminent philosophers and theologians, and places them in dialogue with eleven original essays reflecting new thinking by these and other scholars. Even if God and evil are compatible, it remains hotly contested whether evil renders belief in God unreasonable. Is evil evidence against the existence of God? A collection of essays by philosophers, theologians, and other scholars. The Evidential Argument from Evil Book Description : What emerges from these critical but friendly exchanges is a diversity of fruitful and innovative ways of thinking about the nature of divinity and its relationship to evil. To make progress towards this goal, eight distinct perspectives are placed in mutual dialogue, giving voice to both traditional and relatively unorthodox approaches. The time is ripe for a wholesale reconsideration of the problem of evil. One of those rare questions in philosophy that is not only technically recalcitrant but also engages the hearts and minds of the broad community is the so-called 'problem of evil': How can the existence of an absolutely perfect God be reconciled with the existence of suffering and evil? This collection of dialogues between eight philosophers of religion explores new ways of thinking about this longstanding problem, in the process reorienting and reinvigorating the philosophical debate around the relationship between God, goodness and evil: How exactly are these three notions connected, if at all? Is God the cause, or author, of evil and suffering? How is the goodness of God to be understood, and how is divine goodness related to human morality? Does God's perfect goodness entail that God must have reasons for permitting or bringing about suffering, and if so what could his reasons be? These questions are of momentous existential and theoretical interest, and they have exercised the finest intellects across the centuries. An ideal volume for introducing students to the subtleties and intricacies of philosophical discussion. Once again, Perry's ability to get at the heart of matters combines with his exemplary skill at writing the dialogue form.
#Dialogue on good evil and the existence of god sparknotes free
Recurring themes are the distinction between natural evil and evil done by free agents, and the problems the Holocaust and other cases of genocide pose for conceptions of the universe as a basically good place, or humans as basically good beings. As the discussion continues they consider the nature of human evil-whether, for example, fully rational actions can be intentionally evil. In the early part of the work, Gretchen and her friends consider whether evil provides a problem for those who believe in the perfection of God. John Perry-author of the acclaimed Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality (Hackett Publishing Co., 1978)-revisits Gretchen Weirob in this lively and absorbing dialogue on good, evil, and the existence of God.
Dialogue on Good Evil and the Existence of Godĭialogue on Good Evil and the Existence of God Book Description :
0 kommentar(er)
